CP2K tutorial for biochemical systems
jts2t... at gmail.com
jts2t... at gmail.com
Thu Jul 20 01:15:40 UTC 2017
Thanks for your patience !
在 2017年7月19日星期三 UTC+8下午9:40:39,Dries Van Rompaey写道:
>
> Hi,
>
> You can observe the reaction occurring by visualising the xyz files of
> metadynamics qmmm simulation - you will see the C-O bond breaking and the
> C-C bond forming. You can also plot the collective variable in the
> metadynlog file: the 3 to 8 bohr region is occupied by the substrate and
> the -3 to -8 region is occupied by the product.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Dries
>
> Op woensdag 19 juli 2017 15:12:14 UTC+2 schreef jts2... at gmail.com:
>>
>> Thanks for your reply, Dries !
>>
>> The first paragraph you said is understood. I also wonder how does one
>> know the reaction really occurs in the simulation ? i.e. Which part of the
>> output file is important to know the information about the reaction ?
>>
>> I major in calculation mathematics, therefore the easy thing for you may
>> seems hard for me.
>> I'll appreciate for your reply !
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2017年7月19日星期三 UTC+8下午8:00:59,Dries Van Rompaey写道:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The MM simulations in the tutorial are intended to allow the system to
>>> relax and to find suitable cell dimensions. We do this at the MM level
>>> because it's rather fast when compared to QMMM. The relaxed system is then
>>> moved to the QMMM level in order to simulate bond breaking.
>>>
>>> The reaction is not sampled in the *unbiased* QMMM, which is why we add
>>> metadynamics in the second part. Once we bias the collective variable, you
>>> can see the reaction occurring at the QMMM level.
>>>
>>>
>>> Op woensdag 19 juli 2017 13:34:52 UTC+2 schreef jts2... at gmail.com:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dries,
>>>>
>>>> I have read the tutorial and wonder how could I show the advantage of
>>>> QMMM calculation over MM calculation. Should I run a complete MM simulation
>>>> and compare the two results ? I notice that you said in the tutorial that
>>>> the reaction is not achieved in the simulation. Does that mean QMMM method
>>>> doesn't work in this simulation ?
>>>>
>>>> 在 2017年7月18日星期二 UTC+8下午2:49:11,Dries Van Rompaey写道:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi cp2k-users,
>>>>>
>>>>> After experimenting with cp2k for a while I have written down a short
>>>>> tutorial on how to use cp2k for biochemical systems. The tutorial covers
>>>>> the setup of an enzyme system with ambertools followed by equilibration
>>>>> with cp2k at the MM level, after which we move the system to QM/MM for
>>>>> metadynamics simulations of an enzymatic reaction. I am far from an expert
>>>>> myself, but I thought this might be useful to people starting out. If you
>>>>> spot any mistakes or something that could be improved, please let me know.
>>>>> The tutorial can be found at https://driesvr.github.io/Tutorials/.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Dries
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> 在 2017年7月19日星期三 UTC+8下午8:00:59,Dries Van Rompaey写道:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The MM simulations in the tutorial are intended to allow the system to
>>> relax and to find suitable cell dimensions. We do this at the MM level
>>> because it's rather fast when compared to QMMM. The relaxed system is then
>>> moved to the QMMM level in order to simulate bond breaking.
>>>
>>> The reaction is not sampled in the *unbiased* QMMM, which is why we add
>>> metadynamics in the second part. Once we bias the collective variable, you
>>> can see the reaction occurring at the QMMM level.
>>>
>>>
>>> Op woensdag 19 juli 2017 13:34:52 UTC+2 schreef jts2... at gmail.com:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dries,
>>>>
>>>> I have read the tutorial and wonder how could I show the advantage of
>>>> QMMM calculation over MM calculation. Should I run a complete MM simulation
>>>> and compare the two results ? I notice that you said in the tutorial that
>>>> the reaction is not achieved in the simulation. Does that mean QMMM method
>>>> doesn't work in this simulation ?
>>>>
>>>> 在 2017年7月18日星期二 UTC+8下午2:49:11,Dries Van Rompaey写道:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi cp2k-users,
>>>>>
>>>>> After experimenting with cp2k for a while I have written down a short
>>>>> tutorial on how to use cp2k for biochemical systems. The tutorial covers
>>>>> the setup of an enzyme system with ambertools followed by equilibration
>>>>> with cp2k at the MM level, after which we move the system to QM/MM for
>>>>> metadynamics simulations of an enzymatic reaction. I am far from an expert
>>>>> myself, but I thought this might be useful to people starting out. If you
>>>>> spot any mistakes or something that could be improved, please let me know.
>>>>> The tutorial can be found at https://driesvr.github.io/Tutorials/.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Dries
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20170719/a9ee0c2c/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list