[CP2K:9803] Problems of shell model and optimization
zuohen... at gmail.com
zuohen... at gmail.com
Fri Dec 15 07:06:10 UTC 2017
Hi Matthias!
Thank you for your reply. I use intramolecular interactions and core shell
model according to a paper(J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 4965-4968), though
they did not use CP2K. This is the link of the paper:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp048748h
I did not find any warning in manuals and I am not sure whether it is
impossible to use intramolecular interactions involving core-shell model.
Can you tell me where the information is?
I am very glad if you could give me some other advices. Because I would use
QM/MM in my subsequent simulations, CP2K is still my first choice.
Thank you very much. I hope we can have more discussions.
Best wishes.
在 2017年12月15日星期五 UTC+8上午12:42:54,Matthias Krack写道:
>
> Hi zuoheng199247
>
>
>
> If I am not mistaken, bonded (intramolecular) interactions involving
> core-shell atoms are not considered/implemented in CP2K. MD might run, but
> with wrong forces obviously as shown by the GEO_OPT runs. So your MD runs
> are presumably not OK, too.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:> [mailto:
> cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *zuoh... at gmail.com
> <javascript:>
> *Sent:* 14 December 2017 14:52
> *To:* cp2k
> *Subject:* [CP2K:9803] Problems of shell model and optimization
>
>
>
> Dear friends,
>
>
>
> I have a problem when I use core-shell model with bond potential to do
> cell(geometry) optimization at the same time. I choose classical force
> field. In FORCE_EVAL / MM / FORCEFIELD, I set some buckingham potential and
> morse potential bond and hamonic bend parameters.
>
>
>
> When I only use bond potential and optimization without core-shell model,
> or only use core-shell model and bond potential to do MD simulations, all
> of them are OK. When I use the three modules at the same time, the
> computation will interrupt after some steps, though the CPU is still
> occupied and don't have any error or warning in output files.
>
>
>
> The following table is more clear. The input files are given as three
> attach files.
>
>
>
> I want to use core-shell model with classical force field to do energy
> minimization. I don't know how to fix this problem even though I have study
> FORCE_EVAL / MM / FORCEFIELD section in CP2K 4.1 manual. I am confused
> understand why the MD simulation is OK with shell model but optimization is
> not OK.
>
>
>
> I hope to receive your reply. Thank you very much.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-ja4OPffuI4k/WjKBVb6x4_I/AAAAAAAAAAY/KC0FJV43HEkQqcd0vBdzYIc8ue8H4bQgACLcBGAs/s1600/%25E5%25BE%25AE%25E4%25BF%25A1%25E5%259B%25BE%25E7%2589%2587_20171214214846.png>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20171214/d72f55c6/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list