PDOS eigenvalues near Fermi level are not sorted properly
Alex Vozny
ovo... at gmail.com
Sat Apr 8 17:45:29 UTC 2017
OK, I see.
Yes, this is OT, and, apparently, the system is metallic, at least in this
unrelaxed configuration.
Working with fractional occupation is a pain in CP2K, or at least it
provides no benefits/speedup compared to other programs.
Alex.
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 5:26:46 PM UTC-4, Matt W wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is your SCF fully converged? Is your system (very close to) metallic?
>
> If you are running OT, it calculates the ground state density first, then
> at the pdos states finds LUMOs that are orthogonal to the occupied states.
> This is saying that it finds some LUMOs lower in energy than occupied
> states.
>
> While we are at it, is this system similar (same?) to the one you reported
> with inconsistency between pdos and cubes?
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 3:52:05 PM UTC+1, Alex Vozny wrote:
>>
>> Here is an example:
>> 1819 -0.096060 2.000000 0.00228579
>> 0.06867136 0.00357453
>> 1820 -0.093844 2.000000 0.00815732
>> 0.01590175 0.00444991
>> 1821 -0.093705 2.000000 0.00936543
>> 0.01842093 0.00464511
>> 1822 -0.092709 2.000000 0.00117320
>> 0.00508035 0.00225085
>> 1823 -0.092626 2.000000 0.00317422
>> 0.00800068 0.00255608
>> 1824 -0.091870 2.000000 0.00503839
>> 0.00999660 0.00359990
>> 1825 * -0.098011* 0.000000 0.03037013
>> 0.02025094 0.00472899
>> 1826 -0.096724 0.000000 0.01318675
>> 0.04356782 0.00400355
>> 1827 -0.096528 0.000000 0.01638755
>> 0.04630115 0.00407204
>> 1828 -0.093383 0.000000 0.00480571
>> 0.00915687 0.00292543
>> 1829 -0.092029 0.000000
>>
>> Why does this happen sometimes?
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20170408/e5b22fab/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list