Unusually long time for geometry optimization
Megha Anand
meghaan... at gmail.com
Sun Oct 23 21:36:14 UTC 2016
The output file is huge. Therefore, I had to share it using google drive.
Don't know if that is the right way to share the output file.
On Sunday, October 23, 2016 at 5:34:09 PM UTC-4, Megha Anand wrote:
>
> Dear CP2K lovers,
>
> Please help me figure out what I doing wrong. I am using GAPW method
> (non-periodic) to perform geometry optimization on an iron complex. The
> starting geometry for the CP2K job was taken from G03 output and it took
> ~900 steps for the same geometry to converge. The final energy differs from
> G03 energy by almost 0.1a.u.
>
> Since there could be so many variables in my input that could be
> contributing to the problem, I am lost as to where to start from. Experts
> please help me with your suggestions so that I can settle down with
> starting conditions for my system in this project. I took inputs from
> different discussions on this group to create the input but it does not
> seem to be working for my system.
>
> I have attached the input and output file. Thank you so much for your help
> and time - Megha
>
> &GLOBAL
> PROJECT fe3-3w-2oh-cis+_3
> RUN_TYPE GEO_OPT
> PRINT_LEVEL LOW
> WALLTIME 86400
> &END GLOBAL
>
> &FORCE_EVAL
> METHOD Quickstep
> &DFT
> BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME /share/apps/cp2k/cp2k/tests/QS/EMSL_BASIS_SETS
> POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME /share/apps/cp2k_libxc/cp2k/tests/QS/POTENTIAL
> CHARGE 1
> MULTIPLICITY 6
> UKS T
>
> &MGRID
> CUTOFF 200
> REL_CUTOFF 50
> &END MGRID
>
> &QS
> METHOD GAPW
> EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-12
> MAP_CONSISTENT TRUE
> EXTRAPOLATION ASPC
> EXTRAPOLATION_ORDER 3
> &END QS
>
> &SCF
> MAX_SCF 10
> SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
> EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
> &OT ON
> MINIMIZER DIIS
> PRECONDITIONER FULL_ALL
> ENERGY_GAP 0.001
> &END OT
>
> &OUTER_SCF
> EPS_SCF 1.0E-5
> MAX_SCF 15
> &END OUTER_SCF
> &END SCF
> &XC
> &XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE
> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
> &END XC
> &POISSON
> PERIODIC NONE
> POISSON_SOLVER MT
> &MT
> ALPHA 7.0
> REL_CUTOFF 2.0
> &END MT
> &END POISSON
> &PRINT
> &E_DENSITY_CUBE
> FILENAME ./test
> &END
> &TOT_DENSITY_CUBE
> FILENAME ./test_tot
> &END
> &END PRINT
> &END DFT
> &SUBSYS
> &CELL
> ABC 30.00 30.00 30.00
> PERIODIC NONE
> &END CELL
> &COORD
> Fe 14.9401246767 15.1730170871 14.3555002843
> O 15.0596344159 16.9375282790 13.2975453974
> H 14.2538678680 17.4507795693 13.0956155106
> O 14.9453553252 13.1927626321 13.4194819910
> H 15.2843021499 12.4108541291 13.8987295398
> O 17.0510615103 15.1758350735 13.8809994066
> H 17.4911849711 14.6195675836 13.2096008254
> O 13.1717319321 15.0601396151 14.2257170309
> H 12.5061415142 15.1689270656 14.9281003482
> O 15.5436038502 15.1772185519 16.0226634710
> H 15.0556045457 15.2777287347 16.8590316379
> H 17.5187009092 15.0566722014 14.7328323963
> H 13.9828597805 13.0516518317 13.2933983562
> H 15.8433357996 17.5198182449 13.2734036704
> &END COORD
>
> &TOPOLOGY
> &CENTER_COORDINATES
> &END
> &END TOPOLOGY
> &KIND H
> BASIS_SET 6-31G**
> POTENTIAL ALL
> &END KIND
> &KIND O
> BASIS_SET 6-31G**
> POTENTIAL ALL
> &END KIND
> &KIND Fe
> BASIS_SET 6-31G**
> POTENTIAL ALL
> &END KIND
> &END SUBSYS
> &END FORCE_EVAL
> &MOTION
> &GEO_OPT
> TYPE MINIMIZATION
> OPTIMIZER CG
> MAX_ITER 2000
> RMS_DR 0.10E-04
> MAX_DR 0.30E-04
> RMS_FORCE 0.10E-04
> MAX_FORCE 0.30E-04
> &CG
> MAX_STEEP_STEPS 0
> &LINE_SEARCH
> TYPE 2PNT
> &2PNT
> MAX_ALLOWED_STEP 0.20
> &END
> &END
> &END CG
> &END GEO_OPT
> &PRINT
> &CELL HIGH
> &END CELL
> &STRUCTURE_DATA HIGH
> &END STRUCTURE_DATA
> &END PRINT
> &END MOTION
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20161023/60308a83/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list