[CP2K:7067] Re: Unusual Behavior of CELL opt progress of CP2K26
贾建峰
jjf_... at 163.com
Tue Oct 20 06:36:06 UTC 2015
The lattice parameter of fcc Pt were obtained from reference (https://chemistry.osu.edu/~woodward/ch754/str_cp.htm;) which should be experimental value.
Jianfeng
At 2015-10-19 13:09:01, "Babu" <mpb... at gmail.com> wrote:
hi, Jianfeng Jia,
Can you please describe how you define
&CELL
A 3.9239 0.0000000000000000E+00 0.0000000000000000E+00
B 0.0000000000000000E+00 3.9239 0.0000000000000000E+00
C 0.0000000000000000E+00 0.0000000000000000E+00 3.9239 these values for your pt atom.
On Sunday, 11 October 2015 12:44:08 UTC+5:30, jjf... at yahoo.com.cn wrote:
Dear All,
I am using CP2K to optimize the cell of Pt metal. The input is as below,
&GLOBAL
PRINT_LEVEL LOW
PROJECT_NAME Pt
RUN_TYPE CELL_OPT
&END GLOBAL
&MOTION
&CELL_OPT
OPTIMIZER BFGS
KEEP_SYMMETRY T
&END CELL_OPT
&END MOTION
&FORCE_EVAL
METHOD QS
STRESS_TENSOR ANALYTICAL
&DFT
&SCF
MAX_SCF 50
EPS_SCF 9.9999999999999995E-10
CHOLESKY INVERSE
ADDED_MOS 500
&MIXING
METHOD BROYDEN_MIXING
ALPHA 0.1
BETA 0.7
NBROYDEN 8
&END
&SMEAR ON
METHOD FERMI_DIRAC
ELECTRONIC_TEMPERATURE [K] 100
&END SMEAR
&DIAGONALIZATION T
&END DIAGONALIZATION
&END SCF
&QS
METHOD GPW
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-12
EXTRAPOLATION USE_GUESS
&END QS
&MGRID
CUTOFF 4.0000000000000000E+02
&END MGRID
&XC
DENSITY_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
GRADIENT_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
TAU_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
&XC_FUNCTIONAL NO_SHORTCUT
&PBE T
&END PBE
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&VDW_POTENTIAL
POTENTIAL_TYPE PAIR_POTENTIAL
&PAIR_POTENTIAL
R_CUTOFF 9.0000000000000000E+00
TYPE DFTD3
PARAMETER_FILE_NAME /lustre/home/jiajf/cp2k/dftd3.dat
REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE
EPS_CN 9.9999999999999995E-07
CALCULATE_C9_TERM T
REFERENCE_C9_TERM T
LONG_RANGE_CORRECTION T
VERBOSE_OUTPUT F
&END PAIR_POTENTIAL
&END VDW_POTENTIAL
&END XC
&POISSON
POISSON_SOLVER PERIODIC
PERIODIC XYZ
&END POISSON
&END DFT
&SUBSYS
&CELL
A 3.9239 0.0000000000000000E+00 0.0000000000000000E+00
B 0.0000000000000000E+00 3.9239 0.0000000000000000E+00
C 0.0000000000000000E+00 0.0000000000000000E+00 3.9239
PERIODIC XYZ
SYMMETRY CUBIC
MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL 4 4 4
&END CELL
&COORD
Pt 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Pt 0.0000 1.9620 1.9620
Pt 1.9620 0.0000 1.9620
Pt 1.9620 1.9620 0.0000
&END COORD
&KIND Pt
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q18
&END KIND
&TOPOLOGY
MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL 4 4 4
&END TOPOLOGY
&END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL
It can achieve covegence smoothly after about 8 SCF-cycles. However, I found the energies from each SCF-cycle were below,
ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.): -30774.690068596093624
ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.): -30774.474988016871066
ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.): -30773.785173646669136
ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.): -30772.813279130394221
ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.): -30772.382090925824741
ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.): -30772.370917807555088
ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.): -30772.370406719932362
ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.): -30772.370389366384188
It is clearly that the optimzed cell has higher energy than the original cell. It is out of my understanding. Anyone can help?
Jianfeng Jia
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20151020/9ffe3907/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list