Recommendation on the use of counter ions or general functional/basis set combination
norman.... at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 08:50:13 CEST 2015
while moving from CPMD to the lovely CP2k we stumbled into the problem,
that the use of counter ions e.g. Na+ is regulating our cutoff. The rule of
thumb says one should take approx. the highest exponent of the basis sets
in the system multiplied by 40 to get a good energy conservation. This
results in a cutoff of 680 for the Na GTH BLYP. I've seen that for some
functionals there are also weaker versions of the basis sets or pseudo
potentials with less electrons, but it seems that for no functional there's
a really complete set of pseuo potentials and basis sets around.
So currently we have the following questions to clear up our confusion:
1. Should we use BLYP as our preferred functional, what are you guys using
2. Is PADE as bad as we think, assuming it's only local density
3. Should we use basis sets and pseuo potentials that do not fit in the
number of electrons?
4. What is the "usual" functional to use for simple biological systems?
Thank you all
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CP2K-user