[CP2K:6441] Problems with GAPW + external potential
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Fri May 1 14:46:26 UTC 2015
Hi
unfortunately, I don't have time to look into this.
It seems to me that for analytic potentials it wouldn't be that hard,
but for potentials read in on a grid it would need special care.
regards
Juerg
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----To: cp... at googlegroups.com
From: Juha Ritala
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 04/30/2015 01:18PM
Subject: Re: [CP2K:6441] Problems with GAPW + external potential
Hi Juerg,
thank you for confirming this. Is there any chance that this will be fixed in the near future, or should I stick with GPW for the time being? I could try and fix it myself, but as far as I understand how GAPW works, considering the contribution from the local atomic charges is not at all trivial.
- Juha
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 2:17:45 PM UTC+3, jgh wrote:Hi
yes, this is a bug. The external potential is applied to the
charge on the plane wave grid. In GAPW only the soft part
of the charge is on the grid and one would have to also compute
the contributions from the local atomic charges.
regards
Juerg Hutter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----To: cp... at googlegroups.com
From: Juha Ritala
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 04/29/2015 09:52AM
Subject: [CP2K:6432] Problems with GAPW + external potential
I have had some problems when I tried to use GAPW method combined with an external potential. To demonstrate what seems to be the source of the problems, I made this simple test case with a water molecule in a constant external potential. Physically, the constant background potential should not affect the total energy of the water molecule since the molecule is charge neutral. The energy does change as a function of the constant potential when the GAPW method is used, however. You can see this in the attached energy vs. background potential plot. GPW method gives expected behaviour, the total energy stays perfectly constant when the potential is varied.
It seems as if some part of the charge in the system is unaffected by the external potential in GAPW and thus the total charge is effectively non-zero. Is this a bug or is there some part of the implementation missing?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[attachment "E_vs_V_GAPW_and_GPW.pdf" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
[attachment "H2O_constant_extpot_GPW.inp" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
[attachment "H2O_constant_extpot_GPW.out" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
[attachment "H2O_constant_extpot_GAPW.inp" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
[attachment "H2O_constant_extpot_GAPW.out" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list