The warning in the MD calculation
jian... at gmail.com
jian... at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 01:14:55 UTC 2015
Dear Marcella,
Thanks for your reply!
Yes, I need the thermal electron temperature is equal to the atom
temperature, because I simulate the argon system in the high temperature
and high density range. The argon atom will gradually be ionized and the
system become plasma. I hope the system reach thermodynamic equilibrium.
I have done the same thing by VASP code, but the calculation using VASP
need more time. So I want to use CP2K do this simulation.
Here is vasp INCAR
##########################################
SYSTEM = 64Ar-1.93g-17200k
PREC=Accurate
ENCUT = 600.0
IBRION = 0
ISTART = 0
IALGO = 48
NSW = 10000
NBLOCK = 1; KBLOCK = 50
ISYM = 0
SMASS = 1
POTIM = 1.0
TEBEG = 17200 #temperature
TEEND = 17200
ISMEAR = -1; SIGMA = 1.48218 #unit eV 1.48218 eV=17200 Kelvin
LREAL = A
ISIF = 2
NELMIN = 6
NBANDS = 500
##########################################
ISMEAR determines how the partial occupancies are set for each orbital. For
the finite temperature LDA SIGMA determines the width of the smearing in eV.
ISMEAR=-1 is Fermi smearing.
I think the keyword of CP2K (SMEAR and ELECTRONIC_TEMPERTURE) have the same
meanings.
Is that right about my understanding?
Best wishes,
jianzhifu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20150611/8e181426/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list