[CP2K:6123] Re: Issue with symmetry

S Ling lingsa... at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 17:12:24 UTC 2015


Either

    &CELL
      ABC 16.000 15.600 15.600
      ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.00000000 86.40000000 90.00000000
      SYMMETRY MONOCLINIC
    &END CELL

or

    &CELL
      ABC 16.000 15.600 15.600
      ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.00000000 90.00000000 86.40000000
    &END CELL

should give you correct "BETA" angle. You need to rotate the whole lattice 
system for the first setting. Since you are not doing a CELL_OPT, I would 
suggest you to use the second setting, in which you don't need to change 
the coordinate system.

SL

On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 4:50:12 PM UTC, Laszlo Ryan Seress wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've attached my input and coordinate files.  There is some "overflow" 
> beyond the edges of the box, but I have been told this is ok because of 
> periodic boundary conditions.  I got the coordinates from the SI of a 
> paper, which I have not attached due to size, but can be found at this 
> link, in case it is of interest. dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma100551m   In the 
> SI, they have gamma = 86.4, which is why I have it set up that way. 
>
> I am aware that since I didn't rotate the coordinates yet there could be 
> (i.e. almost definitely are) issues with the accuracy of the results, but I 
> suppose I'm surprised that the geometry is still being set to 90 degrees.  
> From what I understand, the program is immediately setting it to an 
> orthorhomic box and so the errors are occurring on calculations that aren't 
> in the right symmetry anyways.  
>
> Thanks again for taking the time to help out with this.
>
> Laszlo
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:38 PM, S Ling <ling... at gmail.com <javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> It would be more useful if you can provide your full input file.
>>
>> As I said in the first post, you need to rotate your lattice if you swap 
>> BETA and GAMMA angles, i.e. you need to change the whole coordinate system 
>> and coordiantes of all the atoms. The "ERRORL2 in 
>> cp_fm_cholesky:cp_fm_cholesky_decompose processor" error message might mean 
>> you have a very bad geometry, which is related to the way you set your CELL 
>> section.
>>
>> SL
>>
>>
>>
>> On 17 February 2015 at 16:11, Laszlo Ryan Seress <lasz... at gmail.com 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you again for the reply.  I thought this was a really good 
>>> suggestion so I was surprised to see that it didn't work (and also felt 
>>> silly that I didn't think of it myself).
>>>
>>> I ran the program twice, with inputs:
>>>
>>> (run *759)
>>>
>>>     &CELL
>>>       ABC 16.000 15.600 15.600
>>>       ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.00000000 86.40000000 90.00000000
>>>       SYMMETRY MONOCLINIC
>>>     &END CELL
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> (run *762)
>>>
>>>     &CELL
>>>       ABC 16.000 15.600 15.600
>>>       ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.00000000 90.00000000 86.40000000
>>>       SYMMETRY MONOCLINIC
>>>     &END CELL
>>>
>>> Both runs ended with errors.  
>>>
>>> Interestingly, in both cases, the output has the following information 
>>> in the beginning:
>>>
>>> CELL_TOP| Volume [angstrom^3]:                                         
>>> 3886.077
>>>  CELL_TOP| Vector a [angstrom    16.000     0.000     0.000    |a| =     
>>>  16.000
>>>  CELL_TOP| Vector b [angstrom     0.000    15.600     0.000    |b| =     
>>>  15.600
>>>  CELL_TOP| Vector c [angstrom     0.000     0.000    15.600    |c| =     
>>>  15.600
>>>  CELL_TOP| Angle (b,c), alpha [degree]:                                 
>>>   90.000
>>>  CELL_TOP| Angle (a,c), beta  [degree]:                                 
>>>   90.000
>>>  CELL_TOP| Angle (a,b), gamma [degree]:                                 
>>>   90.000
>>>  CELL_TOP| Requested initial symmetry:                               
>>>  MONOCLINIC
>>>  CELL_TOP| Numerically orthorhombic:                                     
>>>     YES
>>>
>>> So still the angles are being overwritten.  However, something else is 
>>> clearly breaking because the program is ending with errors.  I don't really 
>>> know how to interpret the error reports in great detail, but I have 
>>> attached them in case they prove useful.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Laszlo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:32 PM, S Ling <ling... at gmail.com 
>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please remove the three A/B/C cell vectors, and set your CELL section 
>>>> like this:
>>>>
>>>> &CELL
>>>> ABC 16.0 15.6 15.6
>>>> ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.00000000 86.40000000 90.00000000
>>>> SYMMETRY MONOCLINIC
>>>> &END CELL
>>>>
>>>> SL
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 2:18:00 PM UTC, Laszlo Ryan Seress 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your reply. 
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried the following input:
>>>>>
>>>>>     &CELL
>>>>>       A     16.00000000    0.000000000    0.000000000
>>>>>       B     0.000000000    15.60000000    0.000000000
>>>>>       C     0.000000000    0.000000000    15.60000000
>>>>>       ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.00000000 86.40000000 90.00000000
>>>>>       SYMMETRY MONOCLINIC
>>>>>     &END CELL
>>>>>
>>>>> but still got this output:
>>>>>
>>>>>  CELL| Volume [angstrom^3]:                                           
>>>>>   3893.760
>>>>>  CELL| Vector a [angstrom]:      16.000     0.000     0.000    |a| =   
>>>>>    16.000
>>>>>  CELL| Vector b [angstrom]:       0.000    15.600     0.000    |b| =   
>>>>>    15.600
>>>>>  CELL| Vector c [angstrom]:       0.000     0.000    15.600    |c| =   
>>>>>    15.600
>>>>>  CELL| Angle (b,c), alpha [degree]:                                   
>>>>>     90.000
>>>>>  CELL| Angle (a,c), beta  [degree]:                                   
>>>>>     90.000
>>>>>  CELL| Angle (a,b), gamma [degree]:                                   
>>>>>     90.000
>>>>>  CELL| Requested initial symmetry:                                   
>>>>>  MONOCLINIC
>>>>>  CELL| Numerically orthorhombic:                                       
>>>>>       YES
>>>>>
>>>>> ​It seems to be overwriting my inputted angles and replacing them with 
>>>>> 90 degrees.
>>>>>
>>>>> ​Best,
>>>>> Laszlo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:02 PM, S Ling <ling... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to rotate your lattice so that your beta=86.4, not 
>>>>>> gamma=86.4. This is the requirement of MONOCLINIC space symmetry in CP2K, 
>>>>>> see http://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/
>>>>>> SUBSYS/CELL.html#desc_SYMMETRY
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SL
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 1:15:44 PM UTC, Laszlo Ryan Seress 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been having an issue with the symmetry command in the CELL 
>>>>>>> section.  My input has:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     &CELL
>>>>>>>       A     16.00000000    0.000000000    0.000000000
>>>>>>>       B     0.000000000    15.60000000    0.000000000
>>>>>>>       C     0.000000000    0.000000000    15.60000000
>>>>>>>       ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.00000000 90.00000000 86.40000000
>>>>>>>       SYMMETRY MONOCLINIC
>>>>>>>     &END CELL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but the output has:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Volume [angstrom^3]:                                     
>>>>>>>     3893.760
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Vector a [angstrom    16.000     0.000     0.000    |a| = 
>>>>>>>      16.000
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Vector b [angstrom     0.000    15.600     0.000    |b| = 
>>>>>>>      15.600
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Vector c [angstrom     0.000     0.000    15.600    |c| = 
>>>>>>>      15.600
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Angle (b,c), alpha [degree]:                             
>>>>>>>       90.000
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Angle (a,c), beta  [degree]:                             
>>>>>>>       90.000
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Angle (a,b), gamma [degree]:                             
>>>>>>>       90.000
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Requested initial symmetry:                               
>>>>>>>  MONOCLINIC
>>>>>>>  CELL_TOP| Numerically orthorhombic:                                 
>>>>>>>         YES
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anyone had a similar issue with getting the angles changed and 
>>>>>>> the program changing the symmetry from monoclinic to orthorhombic?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for any help you may be able to provide.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Laszlo 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> László Ryan Seress
>>>>> las... at laszloseress.com
>>>>>  
>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com 
>>>> <javascript:>.
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> László Ryan Seress
>>> las... at laszloseress.com <javascript:>
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com 
>>> <javascript:>.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> László Ryan Seress
> las... at laszloseress.com <javascript:>
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20150217/5631d52b/attachment.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list