AIMD simulation: increase of the number of the SCF cycles per MD step after some MD steps
Max
latevimax.... at gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 14:47:21 UTC 2014
Le lundi 29 septembre 2014 09:16:06 UTC+2, Florian Schiffmann a écrit :
>
> Hi Max,
>
> Hi Flo,
Thanks a lot for your kind reply !
I am currently looking a bit in the performance of the preconditioners.
>
These are great news :)
> Unfortunately, the better preconditioners are expensive as they require
> diagonalization and I don't see a way around it at the moment.
>
Ok.
> There are some ideas around how to improve Full_single inverse, but that
> will take a little while and nothing promised.
>
Ok. This is fine with me. :-) Please do no hesitate to tell me if you want
I run some tests.
Full Kinetic is the best choice in terms of balancing cost and efficiency
> for large systems. The performance of this preconditioner strongly depends
> on the ENERGY_GAP value in your input. Have you tried playing around with
> it? Quite often a somewhat higher than default value seems to work best.
>
>
I haven't played with the value of energy_gap when using full_kinetic yet.
I'll give it a try and
will keep you informed.
Thanks again for your reply and your help.
Cheers,
Max
Cheers
> Flo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20140929/88e7eedd/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list