[CP2K:5290] Re: Implementing new functionals

[hut... at chem.uzh.ch]

Hi

range separated hybrids are not implemented in the atomic code.
We can therefore not optimize pseudopotentials for such functionals.  
>From experience I would suggest to use pseudpotentials for PBE0
(1. choice) or even PBE (2. choice), but don't mix them.

Juerg
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter                         Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie                  FAX   : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich                   E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------

-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: cp... at googlegroups.com
From: August Melcher 
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 05/16/2014 09:17PM
Subject: [CP2K:5290] Re: Implementing new functionals

This may be getting ahead of myself a bit, but what pseudopotential should I use with wB97X-V? Should I make one using the ATOM program or will one of the existing pseudopotentials work fine?  
  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.