how to improve CP2K scaling for small systems
Matt W
MattWa... at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 10:42:34 UTC 2014
Also, could you post the timings information at the end of completed runs?
I.e. the
SUBROUTINE CALLS ASD SELF TIME TOTAL
TIME
AVERAGE MAXIMUM AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
CP2K 1 1.0 0.056 0.064 9136.160
9136.192
geoopt_bfgs 1 3.0 0.086 0.110 9135.135
9135.363
cp_geo_opt 1 2.0 0.000 0.001 9135.135
9135.363
cp_eval_at 10 4.0 0.000 0.001 8805.294
8805.323
qs_forces 10 5.0 0.356 0.686 8805.275
8805.301
qs_energies_scf 10 6.0 0.010 0.022 7714.098
7714.144
scf_env_do_scf 10 7.0 0.001 0.004 7560.596
7560.621
etc. bits at the end.
It would be helpful to see if FFTs or some other routines are unexpectedly
dominating the calculation, which might help track down what is going on.
Matt
On Monday, March 17, 2014 10:28:27 AM UTC, Florian Schiffmann wrote:
>
> I know it's a stupid question but what's about memory of the machine? The
> system seems quite large, could it be that you run out of memory and use
> the swap?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20140317/f7d9efb9/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list