[CP2K:5586] Average of lagrange multipliers in CP2K
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Wed Aug 6 12:24:03 UTC 2014
Hi
BLYP and AM1 can give rather different energies/forces.
Have you tested this for your system? A factor of 2-3 in the
Lagrange multipliers seem to be not unreasonable.
regards
Jeurg Hutter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: cp... at googlegroups.com
From: bharat
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 08/05/2014 11:53PM
Subject: [CP2K:5586] Average of lagrange multipliers in CP2K
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to calculate PMF of one dimensional proton transfer using Lagrange multiplier method using Semiempirical AM1 and BLYP method. BLYP <lamda> value is quite reasonable. I suppose the unit of <lamda> in case of DFT calculation is Hartree/bohr and distances are in Angstrom.
However I get very different multipliers in the case of SE calculation. Do SE and DFT calculation have different units for multipliers? Can anyone tell me the unit of <lamda> in case of SE?
SE (AM1) BLYP 1 -0.0333333 -0.00207364 1.1 -0.0696904 -0.03140499 1.2 -0.0598259 -0.02256504 1.3 -0.0454967 -0.01996602 1.4 -0.0146373 -0.01028837 1.5 -0.0174961 -0.00695148 1.6 -0.0172387 -0.00747051 1.7 -0.0134213 -0.00780511
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Bharat
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list