[CP2K:4706] Re: Why simulation with PBE functional is too slow?
huan... at mail.huji.ac.il
Mon Oct 7 20:14:26 CEST 2013
I received a message that I can not attach files larger than 8 Mb. As a
result, my output file may not be send to you. Sorry about that.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Matt W <MattWa... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Huan,
> it is not normal for one GGA functional to be massively more expensive
> than another - typically PBE is one of the most robust in fact.
> You have a few unusual keywords in your input, so it is hard to comment
> without seeing the output:
> Is each SCF cycle slower with PBE, or do you need many more SCF cycles?
> How are you estimating memory usage? If you are monitoring it with, say,
> "top" linux command, is the memory usage consistent or does it peak in some
> section that you can identify (localization maybe?)?
> Also, and maybe most importantly, if you strip your input down to a very
> simple calculation do you see these differences? You need to debug your
> results like you would some computer code your wrote. And without a sample
> of the output it is hard to help.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CP2K-user