[CP2K:3183] Re: error in bond dissociation energy of gas phase molecule
teodor... at gmail.com
Thu Apr 7 16:26:50 CEST 2011
No worries Jun -
My question was related to the fact that we observed in same cases a numerical instability with the implementation of BLYP in CP2K.
This does not look like your case though..
This is good because it should be something systematic (if it depends on the pseudo). I mean other codes (like CPMD or PWSCF (using the same pseudos)) should give a similar
result like cp2k.
If I have time later on today, I will compute a similar quantity with one of the two codes above and report the energetics: similar results with independent implementations should provide a better understanding of the issue you are observing.
On Apr 7, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Jun wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply. I was waiting for pbe number using gaussian.
> Here are the results.
> cp2k gaussian
> pseudo 2.36 eV
> all elect. 2.87 eV 2.73 eV
> Similar trend as we found for blyp. with pseudo, it is about 0.5 eV
> smaller than all elect.
> On Apr 7, 5:26 am, Teodoro Laino <teodor... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jun,
>> I was wondering: did you try with a different XC functional ?
>> Could you do the same test with PBE and GPW (comparing cp2k and gaussian) ?
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k?hl=en.
More information about the CP2K-user