obfis... at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 08:05:55 UTC 2010
Thanks Teo! I'll keep that in mind.
On Dec 10, 9:42 am, Teodoro Laino <teodor... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Matt,
> although for water it has been tested, I have several other cases (with other elements rather than O and H) for which it shows still some problematic behavior.
> If you want to use it, use it at your own risk (i.e. please do not submit bug reports for the time being).
> On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Matt McGrath wrote:
> > Hello everyone. I was originally just going to send this to the devs
> > concerned, but I thought it might be useful for the whole group.
> > I'm thinking of having some of my students take a look at semi-
> > empirical stuff with CP2K, both MC and MD. Looking through the Google
> > group, a year ago there was something wrong with the periodic
> > implimentation. Is that still the case? I wasn't able to find any
> > update to the source that said "Periodic SE now working." I have some
> > periodic and cluster systems I'd like to look at, so if that's true,
> > we can still do the cluster systems, but I think it'd be great to use
> > the periodic, too.
> > Thanks!
> > Cheers, Matt
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cp2k?hl=en.
More information about the CP2K-user