[CP2K:2427] Wannier centers and molecular dipoles
Teodoro Laino
teodor... at gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 16:32:21 UTC 2009
You can:
1) CENTER your system in 0. 0. 0.
&TOPOLOGY
&CENTER_COORDINATES
CENTER_POINT 0. 0. 0.
&END
&END
2) Use MT (which is translational invariant) instead of WAVELET (which
forces the system to be between 0 and L) as POISSON_SOLVER.
I'm quite sure (ready to be contradicted) that modifying your input
consistently with points (1) and (2) you should get the right answer.
A general fix for that in the case of periodic none is quite improbable
since Wannier are fully consistent (in cp2k of course) only if you work
in PBC for several boring technical reasons.
Moreover keep in mind that since the molecules may not be necessarily
neutral the molecular dipoles may change on the basis of the reference
point (this probably is the case for the one you said has two water
molecules close to each other).
Teo
Ondrej Marsalek wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to get the Wannier centers and molecular dipoles in a
> calculation in open boundary conditions. I have found two problems. I
> attach two test calculations, together with the output on my machine.
> They have two water molecules and differ only by the position of one
> of them - in the "together" case they are both in the first octant,
> while in the "separate" case they are more spread out.
>
> 1) The Wannier centers are wrapped into the cell from -L/2 to L/2.
> This is a bother for display, but can in principle be resolved in
> post-processing. Unfortunately, it looks like these positions are also
> used for the assignment to molecules and the calculation of charges
> and dipoles. The problem of course does not demonstrate if all the
> centers fall into the first octant. This is the relevant part of the
> output from the two calculations:
>
> # molecule nr, charge, dipole vector, dipole (Debye)
> 1 0.000000 -184.870480 -135.671636 -201.729105 305.415322
> 2 0.000000 -132.712114 -197.946467 -134.405404 273.605778
>
> # molecule nr, charge, dipole vector, dipole (Debye)
> 1 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
> 2 -8.000000 129.208809 111.938778 101.509883 198.820177
>
> 2) Even when the centers are in the right places, the dipoles above do
> not look right.
>
> Can someone please confirm that they get the same results? If so, I
> would like to ask for a fix, if possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Ondrej
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k?hl=en.
>
>
>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list