[CP2K:1899] methane in a water box QM/MM
Juerg Hutter
hut... at pci.uzh.ch
Wed Mar 18 15:39:33 UTC 2009
Hi
0.5 fs is an often used timestep for all atom simulations.
It is adequate for all vibrations including C-H and O-H
stretching. A 1 fs timestep will lead for those high frequency
modes to problems and energy drifts.
regards
Juerg Hutter
----------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Physical Chemistry Institute FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
University of Zurich E-mail: hut... at pci.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
----------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Marius Retegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my continuing saga of using cp2k for running qm/mm calculations I have
> encounter yet another bump.
> While using the input below I get this error "FORCEFIELD| Missing Bond
> ( CT, HC)" and angle ...
>
> &GLOBAL
> PROJECT mebox_qmmm
> RUN_TYPE MD
> PRINT_LEVEL LOW
> &END GLOBAL
>
> &MOTION
> &MD
> ENSEMBLE NVT
> STEPS 1000
> TIMESTEP 1.0
> TEMPERATURE 298
> &THERMOSTAT
> REGION GLOBAL
> TYPE CSVR
> &CSVR
> TIMECON 100
> &END CSVR
> &END THERMOSTAT
> &END MD
> &PRINT
> &RESTART OFF
> &END RESTART
> &RESTART_HISTORY OFF
> &END RESTART_HISTORY
> &END PRINT
> &END MOTION
>
> &FORCE_EVAL
> METHOD QMMM
>
> &DFT
> CHARGE 0
> BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME GTH_BASIS_SETS
> POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME GTH_POTENTIALS
> &MGRID
> CUTOFF 280
> COMMENSURATE
> &END MGRID
> &SCF
> MAX_SCF 20
> EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
> &OT T
> PRECONDITIONER FULL_ALL
> MINIMIZER DIIS
> &END OT
> &PRINT
> &RESTART OFF
> &END RESTART
> &RESTART_HISTORY OFF
> &END RESTART_HISTORY
> &END PRINT
> &END SCF
> &QS
> EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-12
> MAP_CONSISTENT
> EXTRAPOLATION ASPC
> EXTRAPOLATION_ORDER 3
> &END QS
> &XC
> &XC_GRID
> XC_SMOOTH_RHO NN10
> XC_DERIV NN10_SMOOTH
> &END XC_GRID
> &XC_FUNCTIONAL BLYP
> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
> &END XC
> &POISSON
> POISSON_SOLVER MULTIPOLE
> PERIODIC NONE
> &END POISSON
> &END DFT
>
> &MM
> &FORCEFIELD
> VDW_SCALE14 0.5
> EI_SCALE14 0.8333333
> SCALE_CUTOFF .FALSE.
> PARM_FILE_NAME mebox.prmtop
> PARMTYPE AMBER
> &SPLINE
> EMAX_SPLINE 1.0
> RCUT_NB 10
> &END
> &END FORCEFIELD
> &POISSON
> &EWALD
> EWALD_TYPE SPME
> ALPHA .36
> GMAX 23 23 23
> &END EWALD
> &END POISSON
> &END MM
>
> &QMMM
> E_COUPL GAUSS
> USE_GEEP_LIB 7
> &CELL
> ABC 8.0 8.0 8.0
> PERIODIC NONE
> &END CELL
> &QM_KIND C
> MM_INDEX 1
> &END QM_KIND
> &QM_KIND H
> MM_INDEX 2 3 4 5
> &END QM_KIND
> &END QMMM
>
> &SUBSYS
> &CELL
> ABC [angstrom] 23.2782522 22.7141099 23.2326917
> PERIODIC XYZ
> &END CELL
> &TOPOLOGY
> COORDINATE PDB
> COORD_FILE_NAME mebox_npt.pdb
> CONNECTIVITY AMBER
> CONN_FILE_NAME mebox.prmtop
> &END
> &KIND C
> BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
> POTENTIAL GTH-BLYP-q4
> &END KIND
> &KIND H
> BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
> POTENTIAL GTH-BLYP-q1
> &END KIND
> &END SUBSYS
> &END FORCE_EVAL
>
> If I change QMMM with FIST the input runs.
>
> I also have some additional questions, but on somewhat different matters.
>
> In the latest papers that I could find that use cp2k to do qm/mm
> calculations (http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja076081h and
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp074858n) the authors used a integration step of
> 0.5 and 0.48. Unfortunately, they did not discussed their choice. I'm used
> to running qm/mm md with other packages, but I've always used an integration
> step of 1 fs. Is cp2k different :-)?
>
> Is there any place where I can find information regarding the parameters
> xc_deriv and xc_smooth_rho and are "good" choices?
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> >
>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list