methane in a water box QM/MM
Marius Retegan
marius.s... at gmail.com
Wed Mar 18 15:12:51 UTC 2009
Hi,
In my continuing saga of using cp2k for running qm/mm calculations I have
encounter yet another bump.
While using the input below I get this error "FORCEFIELD| Missing Bond
( CT, HC)" and angle ...
&GLOBAL
PROJECT mebox_qmmm
RUN_TYPE MD
PRINT_LEVEL LOW
&END GLOBAL
&MOTION
&MD
ENSEMBLE NVT
STEPS 1000
TIMESTEP 1.0
TEMPERATURE 298
&THERMOSTAT
REGION GLOBAL
TYPE CSVR
&CSVR
TIMECON 100
&END CSVR
&END THERMOSTAT
&END MD
&PRINT
&RESTART OFF
&END RESTART
&RESTART_HISTORY OFF
&END RESTART_HISTORY
&END PRINT
&END MOTION
&FORCE_EVAL
METHOD QMMM
&DFT
CHARGE 0
BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME GTH_BASIS_SETS
POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME GTH_POTENTIALS
&MGRID
CUTOFF 280
COMMENSURATE
&END MGRID
&SCF
MAX_SCF 20
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
&OT T
PRECONDITIONER FULL_ALL
MINIMIZER DIIS
&END OT
&PRINT
&RESTART OFF
&END RESTART
&RESTART_HISTORY OFF
&END RESTART_HISTORY
&END PRINT
&END SCF
&QS
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-12
MAP_CONSISTENT
EXTRAPOLATION ASPC
EXTRAPOLATION_ORDER 3
&END QS
&XC
&XC_GRID
XC_SMOOTH_RHO NN10
XC_DERIV NN10_SMOOTH
&END XC_GRID
&XC_FUNCTIONAL BLYP
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&END XC
&POISSON
POISSON_SOLVER MULTIPOLE
PERIODIC NONE
&END POISSON
&END DFT
&MM
&FORCEFIELD
VDW_SCALE14 0.5
EI_SCALE14 0.8333333
SCALE_CUTOFF .FALSE.
PARM_FILE_NAME mebox.prmtop
PARMTYPE AMBER
&SPLINE
EMAX_SPLINE 1.0
RCUT_NB 10
&END
&END FORCEFIELD
&POISSON
&EWALD
EWALD_TYPE SPME
ALPHA .36
GMAX 23 23 23
&END EWALD
&END POISSON
&END MM
&QMMM
E_COUPL GAUSS
USE_GEEP_LIB 7
&CELL
ABC 8.0 8.0 8.0
PERIODIC NONE
&END CELL
&QM_KIND C
MM_INDEX 1
&END QM_KIND
&QM_KIND H
MM_INDEX 2 3 4 5
&END QM_KIND
&END QMMM
&SUBSYS
&CELL
ABC [angstrom] 23.2782522 22.7141099 23.2326917
PERIODIC XYZ
&END CELL
&TOPOLOGY
COORDINATE PDB
COORD_FILE_NAME mebox_npt.pdb
CONNECTIVITY AMBER
CONN_FILE_NAME mebox.prmtop
&END
&KIND C
BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-BLYP-q4
&END KIND
&KIND H
BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-BLYP-q1
&END KIND
&END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL
If I change QMMM with FIST the input runs.
I also have some additional questions, but on somewhat different matters.
In the latest papers that I could find that use cp2k to do qm/mm
calculations (http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja076081h and
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp074858n) the authors used a integration step of
0.5 and 0.48. Unfortunately, they did not discussed their choice. I'm used
to running qm/mm md with other packages, but I've always used an integration
step of 1 fs. Is cp2k different :-)?
Is there any place where I can find information regarding the parameters
xc_deriv and xc_smooth_rho and are "good" choices?
Thanks,
Marius
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20090318/d534fb79/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list