[CP2K:1728] Re: Version control system
ondrej.... at gmail.com
Mon Jan 26 15:53:53 CET 2009
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 15:45, Teodoro Laino <teodor... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Ondrej,
> for the User perspective at the moment CVS is more than enough.
> I agree that other version control (svn, git) maybe more powerful and
> flexible (more for developers than for
> users though) but there is no need at the moment for such a change.
Well, in the case of a VCS, I consider the "users" to be the
developers working with it. Of course if everyone is happy (or at
least not unhappy enough) with CVS, no reason to change it. I was just
wondering how much of an issue this was.
> Ondrej Marsalek wrote:
>> Dear CP2K developers,
>> without meaning to start a flamewar, I would like to ask - has some
>> other version control system than CVS been considered for CP2K? Does
>> anyone else think it would be nice to have something more flexible and
>> user-friendly than CVS?
>> Thanks for any comments,
More information about the CP2K-user