[CP2K:1728] Re: Version control system

Ondrej Marsalek ondrej.... at gmail.com
Mon Jan 26 15:53:53 CET 2009


On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 15:45, Teodoro Laino <teodor... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Ondrej,
>
> for the User perspective at the moment CVS is more than enough.
> I agree that other version control (svn, git) maybe more powerful and
> flexible (more for developers than for
> users though) but there is no need at the moment for such a change.

Well, in the case of a VCS, I consider the "users" to be the
developers working with it. Of course if everyone is happy (or at
least not unhappy enough) with CVS, no reason to change it. I was just
wondering how much of an issue this was.

Thanks,
Ondrej


> Teo
>
> Ondrej Marsalek wrote:
>> Dear CP2K developers,
>>
>> without meaning to start a flamewar, I would like to ask - has some
>> other version control system than CVS been considered for CP2K? Does
>> anyone else think it would be nice to have something more flexible and
>> user-friendly than CVS?
>>
>> Thanks for any comments,
>> Ondrej
>>
>> >
>>
>
>
> >
>



More information about the CP2K-user mailing list