ROKS input
Hanning Chen
chenh... at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 03:57:27 UTC 2009
Dear CP2k community,
I performed geometry optimization for C2H4 at first singlet excited state
(S1) using ROKS, and found that the optimized geometry is exactly same as
the ground state (S0). Can anyone help me to figure out the way to optimize
geometry at low-spin excited state? I also ran an geometry optimization at
first triplet excited state (T1) , and obtained a distinct geometry as
expected. I guess I might miss some key options in the input file shown
below.
Thanks.
Hanning Chen
Department of Chemistry
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208
Input file:
&FORCE_EVAL
METHOD Quickstep
&DFT
ROKS
MULTIPLICITY 1
&QS
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-8
&END QS
&SCF
MAX_SCF 100
SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
&DIAGONALIZATION
ALGORITHM STANDARD
&END DIAGONALIZATION
&END SCF
&XC
&XC_FUNCTIONAL PADE
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&END XC
&END DFT
&SUBSYS
&CELL
ABC 6.0 6.0 8.0
&END CELL
&COORD
C -0.2558206925 -0.0439868417 0.6850619693
C -0.2214915625 -0.0386665897 -0.6514432536
H -0.4100752923 0.8714166677 1.2581094627
H -0.1401850725 -0.9650616559 1.2579495323
H -0.0795226532 -0.9560364450 -1.2252531634
H -0.3528336094 0.8817708920 -1.2228724740
&END COORD
&KIND H
BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH-PADE
POTENTIAL GTH-PADE-q1
&END KIND
&KIND C
BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH-PADE
POTENTIAL GTH-PADE-q4
&END KIND
&END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL
&GLOBAL
PROJECT C2H4
RUN_TYPE GEOMETRY_OPTIMIZATION
PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM
&END GLOBAL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20090429/c885b030/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list