[CP2K:2008] Re: derivation method for second_derivative of XC functionals
Hanning Chen
chenh... at gmail.com
Sat Apr 18 20:50:29 UTC 2009
Dear Axel,
Please see my input file below:
&FORCE_EVAL
METHOD Quickstep
&DFT
EXCITATIONS TDDFPT
&TDDFPT
INVERT_S Y
KERNEL Y
MAX_KV 60
NEV 3
OE_CORR SAOP
REORTHO 2
RES_ETYPE SINGLETS
RESTARTS 2
&XC
&XC_FUNCTIONAL
&PBE
&END PBE
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&END XC
&END TDDFPT
&MGRID
CUTOFF 280
&END MGRID
&QS
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-10
&END QS
&SCF
SCF_GUESS RESTART
EPS_SCF 1.0E-5
MAX_SCF 1000
&OT
MINIMIZER DIIS
&END OT
&END SCF
&XC
&XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&END XC
&END DFT
&SUBSYS
&CELL
ABC 20.0 20.0 20.0
&END CELL
&COORD
...........................
&END COORD
&KIND Ag
BASIS_SET DZV-GTH-LDA-q11-very-confined
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q11
&END KIND
&END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL
&GLOBAL
PROJECT ag_20
RUN_TYPE SPECTRA
PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM
&END GLOBAL
Thanks.
Hanning
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Axel <akoh... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 18, 2:22 pm, Hanning Chen <chenh... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear CP2K users,
> >
> > I ran a TDDFPT calculation for excitation energies using PBE as my XC
> > functionals. I encountered an error "Please provide a derivation method
> > 12:50:04 ERRORL2 in pw_poisson_methods:pw_poisson_solve err=-300 12:50:06
> > ERRORL2 in xc:xc_calc_2nd_deriv err=-300 condition FAILED". I guess that
> > was caused by a missing parameter for the second derivative of the XC
> terms.
>
> my guess is rather a missing implementation.
> please post an input example.
>
> axel.
>
> > Please help me to resolve this issue.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Hanning Chen
> >
> > Department of Chemistry
> > Northwestern University
> > Evanston, IL 60208
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20090418/1113f70f/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list