[CP2K:/] Re: g95 errors

[Teodoro Laino]

Hi,

On 21 Mar 2008, at 10:08, radsci2008 wrote:

> intended for only the 32-bit version, a comment to that effect might
> be added to the respective arch files to indicate that.

maybe Juerg was not clear enough yesterday. We're talking about the  
integer representation not
the reals. CP2K works perfectly for 64-bit REALS (DOUBLE PRECISION in  
the case of a 32-bit representation for REAL and INTEGER).

Moreover, I could be wrong, but I don't see any reason why a 64-bit  
default INTEGER g95 should give better results than 32-bit default  
INTEGER.
well yes.. It consumes MUCH more memory.. if you like that..

Be safe and use the standard fortran version of g95: http:// 
ftp.g95.org/g95-x86_64-64-linux.tgz
When there will be around a compiler with standard 64-bit  
representation (in which double precision will be 128-bit long) then  
we can discuss again about that.. for the time being if you wanna use  
64-bit for integers and 64-bit for double precision.. well.. it's  
your problem..

Teo

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20080321/e28286ec/attachment.htm>