[CP2K:854] Re: g95 errors

LIANG Yunfeng liangy... at gmail.com
Thu Mar 20 18:17:33 UTC 2008

 I have two experiences, using both compiler 32-bit and 64-bit. And 32-bit
g95 goes to the final and can pass all the tests: 64-bit g95 met the same
error as you posted. Even I remember the name of the compiler:
x86_64-suse-linux-gnu-g95(64 bit) and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-g95(32-bit).
I wrote the above message in order to reminder you go to g95 website to get
the right version...

Sincerely, Yunfeng

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Teodoro Laino <teodor... at gmail.com>

> Let me comment on that.
> Few of us had a discussion yesterday about this point and we all
> realized that the g95 version you downloaded is non standard.
> In fact quoting these guys:
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpich2/support/index.php?
> s=faqs#g95
> "the Fortran standard requires that INTEGER and REAL be the same size"
> So.. if you download the other g95 (the standard one with 32-bit
> default integer) you won't need any modification to the arch file.
> And most important.. why should be worry for something that is not
> even standard?
> Already with standard stuff there are so many troubles around..
> If you want to play with something that is non standard I personally
> believe that it's your problem to handle properly the
> compilation flags and library problems.
> And back to my previous question:
> What is the reason why you downloaded the g95 default 64-bit integer
> version (if there's any..)?
> Teo
> On 20 Mar 2008, at 11:30, radsci2008 wrote:
> > Okay...I'll try -r8 -i4 when I get a chance; if that works it should
> > probably go in the arch files for g95 explicitly...I'll keep you
> > posted.
> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20080320/c9cb7173/attachment.htm>

More information about the CP2K-user mailing list