SE QMMM total energy
Ben Levine
ben.l... at gmail.com
Wed Feb 6 01:23:48 UTC 2008
Ah, that makes sense. Thanks Teo.
On Feb 5, 5:55 pm, Teodoro Laino <teodor... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Because what is named "MM KINETIC ENERGY" in the output file is the
> full kinetic energy (QM+MM)..
> The idea behind that is that the "MM KINETIC ENERGY" should show the
> full kinetic energy of the system..
> "QM KINETIC ENERGY" includes only the kinetic energy of the QM system.
>
> I will correct the MM into (QM+MM).
> Thanks for the bug reporting;-)
>
> Teo
>
> On 5 Feb 2008, at 23:51, Ben Levine wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Teo,
> > Thanks for the quick reply. I double checked, and perhaps I am
> > misunderstanding, but I definitely see only the MM kinetic energy.
> > I've copied and pasted the *.ener file below, along with the results
> > of grep "KINETIC ENERGY water_3.out". If you run the job and do not
> > see the same thing perhaps my code is incorrectly compiled:
>
> > # Step Nr. Time[fs] Kin.[a.u.]
> > Temp[K] Pot.[a.u.] Cons Qty[a.u.] UsedTime[s]
> > 0 0.000 0.007077832
> > 298.000000000 -12.809514104 -12.802436272
> > 0.000000000
> > 1 2.500 0.005420139
> > 228.205672863 -12.804431644 -12.799011505
> > 0.095200000
> > 2 5.000 0.006138792
> > 258.463331938 -12.804688607 -12.798549815
> > 0.072100000
> > 3 7.500 0.007778487
> > 327.499874002 -12.808075058 -12.800296571
> > 0.073800000
> > 4 10.000 0.005819755
> > 245.030837176 -12.800384559 -12.794564803
> > 0.078000000
> > 5 12.500 0.007197011
> > 303.017835818 -12.800900046 -12.793703035
> > 0.075100000
> > 6 15.000 0.009421318
> > 396.668471214 -12.804785621 -12.795364303
> > 0.077100000
> > 7 17.500 0.006764566
> > 284.810483243 -12.793108105 -12.786343539
> > 0.087400000
> > 8 20.000 0.009602296
> > 404.288216059 -12.790813569 -12.781211273
> > 0.126100000
> > 9 22.500 0.013706087
> > 577.071318572 -12.798208347 -12.784502260
> > 0.078300000
> > 10 25.000 0.006822406
> > 287.245730917 -12.777369767 -12.770547361
> > 0.081400000
>
> > MM INITIAL KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] =
> > 0.707783199322E-02
> > QM INITIAL KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] =
> > 0.263031052446E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.542013896787E-02
> > 0.542013896787E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.178622768263E-02
> > 0.178622768263E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.613879208008E-02
> > 0.577946552398E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.185833827500E-02
> > 0.182228297882E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.777848686574E-02
> > 0.644580597123E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.363399609372E-02
> > 0.242618735045E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.581975536473E-02
> > 0.628929331961E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.188066442328E-02
> > 0.228980661866E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.719701118412E-02
> > 0.647083689251E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.304735268492E-02
> > 0.244131583191E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.942131810825E-02
> > 0.696258376180E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.545782574388E-02
> > 0.294406748390E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.676456627618E-02
> > 0.693429554957E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.238058749932E-02
> > 0.286357034325E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.960229553726E-02
> > 0.726779554803E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.593258936794E-02
> > 0.324719772134E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.137060867146E-01
> > 0.798316123321E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.940983566764E-02
> > 0.393193527093E-02
> > MM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.682240612147E-02
> > 0.786708572203E-02
> > QM KINETIC ENERGY[hartree] = 0.271915374727E-02
> > 0.381065711856E-02
>
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:34 pm, Teodoro Laino <teodor... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
>
> >> check better.. the 3rd column contains always the kinetic energy of
> >> the full system (QM+MM)..
> >> we don't do any difference at that level.. we don't even distinguish
> >> if an atom is MM or QM at that level..
>
> >> ciao,
> >> Teo
>
> >> On 5 Feb 2008, at 23:18, Ben Levine wrote:
>
> >>> I've found that the kinetic energy column of the .ener file only
> >>> contains the MM portion of the kinetic energy. In addition the
> >>> total
> >>> energy is the sum of this energy and the potential energy, but does
> >>> not include the QM kinetic energy. Finally, I've noticed that the
> >>> total energy is not conserved even when I add the QM energy in by
> >>> hand. This suggests that I am missing another component of the
> >>> energy, or that this job is not conserving energy. Thanks for your
> >>> help!
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list