[CP2K:130] GAPW and GTH
Juerg Hutter
hut... at pci.uzh.ch
Tue Jun 19 13:30:53 UTC 2007
Hi Harald
there is an unsolved problem with GAPW: depending on the
basis sets involved, results are very dependent on the
EPS_FIT variable. In you case you can set EPS_FIT to
10^-2 to get reasonable results. Also MD looks much better.
The problem is related to the split of the primitive functions
into hard and soft sets. Changing EPS_FIT moves primitives
from one set to the other. In prinicple this should affect
the total energy only slightly as we trade one source of
errors with another.
I will pu this problem very high on my "to be investigated"
list.
best regards
Juerg
----------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Physical Chemistry Institute FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
University of Zurich E-mail: hut... at pci.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
----------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Harald Forbert wrote:
>
> Teo asked me to also post this here:
>
> When calculating HCl with GTH pseudos, I get weird energies with
> GAPW (positive total energy: +11.6) whereas with GPW
> it is reasonably bound at -15.5. Now if I turn on FULL_GAPW
> it again gives sort of the same energy as GPW, but in both GAPW
> cases the conserved quantity is not conserved - even in a few (5)
> steps MD I get a change of 1e-3 whereas the corresponding
> GPW calculation the conserved quantity only changes by 1.0e-7.
> I did not do a longer MD with FULL_GAPW, but a similar
> calculation with "normal" GAPW also blew up, so it's not just
> a miscalculated conserved quantity.
> Both GPW+GTH and GAPW with all electrons seem to work fine.
> I used the GTH_BASIS_SETS and GTH_POTENTIALS from
> the cvs tree and I pasted the input file below.
>
> Am I doing something wrong, or is GAPW not fully working?
> The same sort of setup works perfectly fine for a single water
> molecule.....
>
> &GLOBAL
> PROGRAM_NAME CP2K
> PROJECT gapw
> RUN_TYPE MD
> PRINT_LEVEL LOW
> &END GLOBAL
> &MOTION
> &MD
> ENSEMBLE NVE
> STEPS 5
> TIMESTEP 0.2
> TEMPERATURE 50.0
> &END MD
> &END MOTION
> &FORCE_EVAL
> METHOD QS
> &DFT
> BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME GTH_BASIS_SETS
> POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME GTH_POTENTIALS
> &QS
> EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-14
> EXTRAPOLATION PS
> EXTRAPOLATION_ORDER 3
> METHOD GAPW
> # FULL_GAPW T
> MAP_CONSISTENT T
> &END QS
> &SCF
> MAX_SCF 100
> EPS_SCF 1.0E-7
> CHOLESKY F
> SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
> &END SCF
> &MGRID
> CUTOFF 400
> &END MGRID
> &XC
> &XC_FUNCTIONAL BLYP
> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
> &END XC
> &END DFT
> &SUBSYS
> &CELL
> ABC 8.0 8.0 8.0
> UNIT ANGSTROM
> &END CELL
> &COORD
> Cl 0.9564675869 -0.4777215658 0.1818080168
> H -0.1657168075 0.1752674377 -0.0159958272
> &END COORD
> &VELOCITY
> 1.57689068E-05 2.13541290E-05 1.89890498E-06
> -2.92031628E-04 6.55172505E-05 1.82242571E-04
> &END VELOCITY
> &KIND Cl
> BASIS_SET TZV2P-GTH
> MASS 3.4968852720999998E+01
> POTENTIAL GTH-BLYP-q7
> &END KIND
> &KIND H
> BASIS_SET TZV2P-GTH
> MASS 1.0079469999999999E+00
> POTENTIAL GTH-BLYP-q1
> &END KIND
> &END SUBSYS
> &END FORCE_EVAL
>
>
> >
>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list